Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Parth Trivedi's avatar

I am in two minds about this. From the top I think identifying a pain, a frustration in the consumer, and then articulating it in a way that feels honest and cathartic is central to the selling process of anything, not just startups or founders with novel products.

Where I differ however, is to encapsulate the entire innovation process down to a causal chain of pain identification. There exist several instances of accidental discoveries, and use coming after innovation (3M's Post It notes for eg.), or even technology evolving to solve a problem that didn't exist, but simply by the tech existing created some delta that gave an unlock.

Of course, in retrospect you can say that people in the late 90s were DYING to have a better way to search the internet and they were in so much pain because of (a lack of) it. But it's also true that for the vast majority, the use case of search did not exist till Google offered it.

My common ground with this post is that a substantial *change of state* is imperative for a product to become successful in terms of finding buyers. If the pursuit of finding the pain itself is missing, good luck finding a buyer. But the implied causality of pain to innovation gets debunked a lot throughout history.

AirBnB itself wasn't born for certainty as you suggest. The genesis of the product was always in low cost. Infact the team was down to their last dollar. They even made cereal (https://techcrunch.com/2008/10/09/whats-for-breakfast-at-your-house-obama-os-or-capn-mccains/) to sustain them for some time before they cracked that good quality photos is what's keeping people from booking. Then whatever you said holds true. Can I then argue that the real pain behind this innovation was death? (of the company) like it was for Archimedes when he sunk into the bath-tub for one last time before his impending death sentence? The story tells us he wasn't even trying to solve the problem anymore.

Innovation comes in many ways and seeks to solve what it deems to be a problem. Often it is only the chaotic roll of several dies at once that casts the final outcome. But the dice of pain must roll in your favour.

Expand full comment
Parth's avatar

Great article!

All purchases are indeed to avoid pain, even if some of them seem like gaining pleasure.

Two concerns:

1) If you position yourself against a pain, you'd better be a new entrant. Calendly could do that. Google Appointment Scheduler could not. Because they solved the same core problem. Google had to say "Appointment scheduling with Google Calendar" and kind of repeated Calendly's positioning "Forget the back and forth and let people instantly book time on your calendar."

Same with Uber and Ola. Both were solving a similar core problem. At some point, usually when there are multiple players solving the same problem (and that is often the case), you cannot just sell the pain anymore. The customer will ask, how do you do it better? And then you are forced to focus on the solution, moving away from the pain. The solution is the opportunity where you show how deeply you are invested in the problem and not just tinkering. It DOES matter if the solution came after arduous, deep research over ten years, when you tell your story. That may not be a differentiator, but it is your unique story. Perhaps the "why" lies in it. People buy that story.

2) Secondly, what if the pain does not yet exist? Many times, you manufacture pains. Ten-minute delivery was not a pain until a smart duo decided to manufacture it in the minds of busy young city dwellers. Today it has become one (successfully; kudos to Zepto). Now Licious’s four-hour delivery feels late. No one even remembers how transformational Amazon’s next-day delivery once was.

When you manufacture a pain, most customers treat it as a luxury/good to have at first, until a new habit is built through repetition. In that sense, the question "What pain dies the second your product shows up?" may not apply, because there was no pain in the first place. Why then would people try you? Maybe you give them something for free or at a discounted rate, and some early adopters give it a shot. As they see value (not necessarily as a painkiller yet), they spread the word. If you have cash to burn, someday you end up manufacturing a new pain!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts